Gluteus Maximus

I ordered atorvastatin (generic Lipitor) for one of my patients with high cholesterol and Medicare Part D coverage. It was denied. We then appealed it (prior authorization). A fax from Maximus Federal Services said their decision was, “UNFAVORABLE.” They said the patient had not tried and failed one of the preferred generic statins (lovastatin or simvastatin). They did note that we could appeal to an Administrative Law Judge.

In fact the person had tried simvastatin, which I had noted on the prior authorization. However the cost savings is minor. According to Goodrx, a 90 day supply of atorvastatin is as low as $19.25 around where I work.  For the equivalent dose of simvastatin it’s $10.06.

Yes, it’s almost half the price, but it’s still a pretty small amount, especially in my patient who had already had a heart attack, and the difference will only get smaller as Lipitor has not been generic for all that long. Contrast that with the staff time wasted dealing with this on both ends. Dealing with this is a pain in the Gluteus Maximus!

About Daniel Ginsberg, MD, FACP

I'm an internal medicine physician and have avidly applied computers to medicine since 1986, when I wrote my first medically oriented computer programs. So yes, that means I'm at least 35-years-old!
This entry was posted in Government, Pharmaceuticals and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Gluteus Maximus

  1. Paul says:

    Clearly a pain in the rear. They (claims process) hope you won’t go to the Administrative Law Judge. I’d suggest they to go to that appeal. It might be helpful for them to have you or your PA attend.

  2. I don’t have a PA (physician assistant, as opposed to prior authorization), and they would not reimburse me for attending. I’d lose hundreds of dollars blocking out my schedule arguing over a $10/month difference in cost.

    • Paul says:

      That’s exactly their plan; i.e., deny, deny because many will not pursue. They “bank” on people accepting denials at 1st and 2nd levels (sometimes 3rd). Insurance companies learned this strategy from the government; both deep pockets, but the government can just print money while denying and denying. It’s been going on for decades. So, your time and money vs. theirs. If this is a non profit you work for, perhaps they should make an administrative “policy” decision and “have your back, paying for your “battle”; isn’t it their battle too or are they not aligned with you? If not, why not? On the other hand, I guess there are many battles; have to pick which ones you are aligned with. What would a private practice do? My 25 cents opinion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s